I may sound stupid, but i was visualizing a graph! Hehe! On the Y! axis, i have a scale which moves from "Actual to conceptual to Ideal" and on the X axis i have series of "Life events"! Well the funda is funny! We strive the ideal, absorb in conceptual till we realize the actual and work back on every life event! So...ideal demands dreaming, visualizing the most perfect aspirations, to achieve this we engage conceptually (plan, execute, list, decide, be practical etc). Many times we refuse to accept the actual (real pain which exists within us, deprived feelings within ourselves, inability to perform simple tasks, inability to love, devote, getting tired etc.)So mostly we are engaged between ideal and conceptual till we are deprived of basic things like food and water! Managing this fluctuation consciously (not by being lost) becomes our daily challenge! If we include actual in our tackling of life events, we may be merrier! I know its funny! I will stop here.........
I don't know! :-) But i know they do create. Look at a hammer. What 'intents' does it create when a child encounters it? or For a normal guy? and for a carpenter? Hammer is not designed for children, but still they are able to hold it and bash up things around them! For a normal guy, the form to an extent may communicate the function to hit a nail or a pull a nail and the intent is created. For a carpenter, its a routine of repeated use and may be of a deep association or a memory or an attachment or even hatred sometimes.....For a normal guy it may give some initial ideas, may trigger some use and later fizzles out since he has no need of it. Anyways...the point is, how do objects like tools create intents of use to different people? Intents are important to accomplish purposes. What intents are triggered to an early user of a cricketing site? What other purposes does he have? How does the nature of use set into routine?
I felt proud when i heard the news of Dr Venky's Nobel nomination. Made me wonder how we know so much about nature and we are so insensitive about it. Last 300 years have been a journey into human's greatest spirit of inquiry, we discovered a million things and not only that we have challenged our thought to an extent that it has exhausted! In this process we have dived into the details of life, how its made etc. We are aware of its delicateness, beauty and nature more than people knew say few hundred years ago. We talk about ribosomes, chromosomes, DNA the way they behave and lot of other million names and terms making up what we called mankind's knowledge. One thing keeps me puzzled, we don't want to accept the natures delicateness, relate to it sensitively and coexist. We relate less, we are preoccupied into something else, something highly unimportant in the name of survival and fear. I feel the focus of science or art whether its the spirit of inquiry or spirit of ...
Comments